Bothered.

After concluding being unable to please everyone, then who do you choose to please. Who are the priorities? Would you try to even out what you can give people nicely or do you show signs of being biased? Even if you do, who gets the priority?

According to some, we should always do what is most pleasing to God. And in that process, we please those who would seem to be the people who deserve higher priority. After all, they are the ones who are pleased when you are pleasing God, so surely they must be wiser than the rest.
____________________________________________________________________

Minghui writes about change be constant, which is true. Possibly every social earthly thing changes as time goes. However, should be embrace change or fight to keep things the way we want it. In my case, when change occurs, it never balances out. Its not as if something changes and good points and bad points are brought forth. Its more of something good changes to something bad and back to the former. Is it too the same for you?

Besides, do people need a constant in their life? Must we have something to anchor ourselves so we feel comfortable? Jesus is a constant, for sure, however he works in ways incomprehensible, so there would still be a feeling of change wouldn't there. But ultimately, all I want to know, is whether to embrace change or fight to keep things as before.
____________________________________________________________________

On a third unrelated note, I finished a book called "Have A Little Faith" by Mitch Albom. A good read. Application in life is never easy.

Feeling rather angsty today. I need to build patience. To give what I want to receive. Oh well. Rather tired, I'll probably sleep soon.

Goodnight dear reader.